Scotland’s earliest Templars are hidden history, hidden in plain sight, undiscovered for want of competent scholarly consideration.

Join the debate, engage the crowd, save heritage, share in the benefits history can bring those who care, as opposed to those that govern.

What makes the discovery genuine? Perhaps the world's best referred academics not offering up a single valid counterargument is a clue.

A lot of historical record is formed by academia 'cherry picking' unresearched and outmoded theory formed over one hundred years ago.

Legal advocates, reviewing the case, all agreed, ‘An enormous coup for Scotland denied because of an 'academic and bureaucratic mess.'

Growing heritage dereliction in the region graphically advertises the local council’s indolent attitude to finding any lasting solution.

It is not surprising early Scottish Templars have not been identified, despite Ailred of Revaulx's eye-witness testimony that, ‘very fine...

There is speculative interest in the bells from overseas, but it is doubtful it is in the best interests of the church or Scottish heritage.

Academic snobbery is accepted in academic life; prejudice against any outside their intellectual circle. A malignancy directed at truth.